Cases 1 - 10 of 122
Randolph v. Dzurendas
as 2:2024cv00106
Petitioner:
Louis Randolph and Clyde Lewis
Respondent:
James Dzurenda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Graham v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08500
Plaintiff:
Clyde R Graham
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clyde Lewis v. James Dzurenda, et al
as 22-16547
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLYDE LEWIS, AKA Louis Randolph
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES DZURENDA, Director, NDOC, BRIAN E. WILLIAMS, Sr., Warden, SDCC, MINOR ADAMS, Asst. Warden, SDCC and others
Clyde Ozell Pittman Jr. v. Brian Cates
as 2:2022cv06937
Petitioner:
Clyde Ozell Pittman, Jr.
Defendant:
Brian Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
O'Donnell v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv01617
Plaintiff:
Kevin O'Donnell
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Kevin Jackson, Nicholas Deranleau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daryl Edwards v. Earl Houser
as 22-35544
Petitioner / Appellant:
DARYL CLYDE EDWARDS
Defendant / Appellee:
EARL HOUSER, Superintendant III
Buckley v. Washoe County Detention Facility
as 3:2022cv00268
Plaintiff:
Clyde Buckley, III
Defendant:
Washoe County Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Houser
as 3:2022cv00053
Petitioner:
Daryl Clyde Edwards
Respondent:
Earl Houser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Louis Randolph v. Brian Williams, Sr., et al
as 22-15385
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOUIS A. RANDOLPH, AKA Clyde Lewis
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN WILLIAMS, Sr., JAMES STOGNER, Chaplain NNCC, JUSTIN, swald Justin Reyes per [43] -Food Staff Manager (SDCC) and others
Edwards v. Houser
as 3:2022cv00056
Plaintiff:
Daryl Clyde Edwards
Defendant:
Earl Houser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
