Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Musgrove v. Parole Board Commission of Idaho et al
as 1:2024cv00394
Defendant:
Millisa Windrow, Raul Labrador, Shelley W. Armstrong and others
Petitioner:
Theodore E Musgrove
Respondent:
Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Ramirez v. Perez et al
as 1:2022cv00564
Plaintiff:
Israel Ramirez
Defendant:
Perez, Khale, Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stoddard, et al. v. Idaho State Penitentiary, et al.
as 1:2021cv00215
Defendant:
Idaho State Penitentiary and The Debi-Cake Program
Plaintiff:
Daniel Paul Stoddard and Gen. of Gangland (lockdown)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Everton Whitely v. CDCR et al
as 2:2020cv02216
Defendant:
F. Villalobos, H. Tillman, E. Guzman and others
Plaintiff:
Everton Whitely
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newman v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2019cv01081
Defendant:
Mr. Geeir, Colette S. Peters, Dr. Peng and others
Plaintiff:
Rico Carlos Newman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shehee v. Hill et al
as 1:2014at00281
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ell Shehee
Defendant:
Laurie Hill , Samantha Perryman , Chris Grijalva and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shehee v. Hill et al
as 1:2014cv00591
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ell Shehee
Defendant:
Laurie Hill , Samantha Perryman , Chris Grijalva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shehee v. Beuster et al
as 1:2014cv00122
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ell Shehee
Defendant:
Yvonne Beuster, Debi Phillips, Melica Villalobos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shehee v. Hill, et al.
as 1:2013cv01936
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ell Shehee
Defendant:
Laurie Hill, Samantha Perryman, Chris Grijalva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shehee v. Hill, et al.
as 2:2013cv02424
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ell Shehee
Defendant:
Laurie Hill, Samantha Perryman, Chris Grijalva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
