Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Clinton Alford v. Federal Judges et al
as 2:2022cv05119
Petitioner:
Clinton Denel Alford, Jr.
Respondent:
Federal Judges, Attorney Caree Harper and Arbitration Program
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Beeson v. Elliott et al
as 9:2021cv00143
Plaintiff:
Taylor Anthony Beeson
Defendant:
Tara J. Elliott, Troy Capser, Brandon Cray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrios v. Federal Judge et al
as 3:2020cv00777
Respondent:
Chief Immigration Judge and Federal Judge
Petitioner:
Efrain Barrios
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lopez v. Homan et al
as 2:2019cv00314
Defendant:
Stephen F. Sisolak, William A. Gittere, Timothy E. Filson and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Southern v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2018cv00258
Defendant:
James Dwayne Deal, James Dzurenda, Nevada Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Southern
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richard O. Bradford Jr. v. Jose I. Sandoval et al
as 2:2017cv03349
Plaintiff:
Richard O Bradford, Jr
Defendant:
Federal Judge Gary R Klausner, Federal Judge Gary R Klausner, Metro L.A.P.D. and others
Henry Jones, Jr. v. Dean Pregerson, et al
as 16-56839
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HENRY A. JONES, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
DEAN D. PREGERSON, Federal Judge at Central District, EDWARD D. WEBSTER, Judge, BRIGS BARKER and others
Dickerson v. US State Judges et al
as 2:2016cv00097
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lee Dickerson, Jr
Defendant:
US State Judges, US Federal Judges , US Federal Prosecutor's and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-35420
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00348
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
