Cases 1 - 10 of 95
(PC) Good v. Pearson et al
as 2:2024cv01503
Plaintiff:
Joshua R. Good
Defendant:
Patty Pearson, Michael Richlin, Alicia Richlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Good v. Shasta County Sheriff Dept
as 2:2024cv01501
Plaintiff:
Joshua R. Good
Defendant:
Shasta County Sheriff Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Samuel D. Good v. Department of Justice Superior Courts et al
as 2:2024cv02713
Plaintiff:
Samuel D. Good, Jr. and Samuel Dennis Good
Defendant:
Department of Justice Superior Courts, Moulten, Elizabeth Boyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Samuel Good Jr v. People of State of California
as 2:2024cv02649
Petitioner:
Samuel Good, Jr.
Respondent:
People of State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goods v. Javate
as 5:2024cv01423
Plaintiff:
Gregory Goods
Defendant:
Rosana Javate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Good Gun v. Driscoll et al
as 6:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Chad Sun Good Gun
Defendant:
Jim Driscoll, Tom Kissle, Montana Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Goods v. Baughman et al
as 2:2023cv02790
Plaintiff:
Gregory Goods
Defendant:
David Baughman, C. Lacy, B. Scruggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goode v. Moses
as 2:2023cv01085
Petitioner:
Dushane Eric Goode
Respondent:
Myron Moses
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Davis v. Laffrey et al
as 2:2023cv00935
Plaintiff:
Gerald Maurice Davis
Defendant:
Brian Laffrey, Piper Sessions, Rachel Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goode v. Lopez et al
as 2:2023cv00565
Plaintiff:
Shawn Goode
Defendant:
Brayan Lopez and Quentin Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
