Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Hill v. United States Parole Commission et al
as 4:2013cv00704
Plaintiff:
Gary D Hill
Defendant:
United States Parole Commission and Isaac Fulwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darrell Parks v. Isaac Fulwood, Jr., et al
as 12-57181
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARRELL JAMES PARKS
Respondent - Appellee:
ISAAC FULWOOD, Jr., Chairman, United States Parole Commission, PAUL R.A. HOWARD, Examiner, United States Parole Commission, FRANCISCO J. QUINTANA, Victorville-Federal Correctional Complex and others
Darrell James Parks v. Isaac Fulwood et al
as 2:2010cv09332
Respondent:
Patricia K. Cushwa, Isaac Fulwood, Jr., Paul R.A. Howard and others
Petitioner:
Darrell James Parks
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01965
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01960
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
William Collier v. Isaac Fulwood, Jr., et al
as 10-17394
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM H. COLLIER
Respondent - Appellee:
ISAAC FULWOOD, Jr. and H. A. RIOS
Rogers v. United States Parole Commission et al
as 3:2010cv01179
Defendant:
Patricia K. Cushwa, Isaac Fulwood, Cranston J. Mitchell and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald L. Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Rogers v. United States Parole Commission et al
as 6:2010cv01179
Defendant:
Patricia K. Cushwa, Isaac Fulwood, Cranston J. Mitchell and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald L. Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00996
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hughes v. United States Parole Commission et al
as 3:2010cv01478
Petitioner:
Andre Hughes
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission and Isaac Fulwood, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
