Cases 1 - 10 of 93
Brooks v. Tenney et al
as 4:2023cv05163
Plaintiff:
Carl Alonzo Brooks
Defendant:
Nancy Tenney, Corey Endo, K. Gallagher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Penzone et al
as 2:2023cv01894
Petitioner:
Cynthia Joann Watson
Respondent:
Paul Penzone and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watson v. Penzone et al
as 2:2023cv01691
Petitioner:
Cynthia Watson and Cynthia Joann Watson
Respondent:
Paul Penzone and Adam C Driggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Watson v. Penzone
as 2:2023cv01006
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Joann Watson
Defendant:
Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Baldner et al
as 2:2023cv00900
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Joann Watson
Defendant:
Victoria Baldner, Kirk D Lewis, Adam Driggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Driggs et al
as 2:2023cv00393
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Joann Watson
Defendant:
Adam Driggs, Paul Penzone, Rachel Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Wilson v. Beceigo et al
as 2:2022cv01768
Plaintiff:
Daniel Keith Wilson
Defendant:
Joanne Beceigo, John W. Lawerence, Karen Dixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ron Bounds v. Donna Byrnes, et al
as 22-35086
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RON BOUNDS
Defendant / Appellee:
DONNA BYRNES, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, KAY HEINRICH, Associate Superintendent, MICHAEL KERR, Counselor - T- Unit and others
(PS) Durlin v. Robinson
as 2:2021cv01495
Plaintiff:
Cody Joanne Durlin
Defendant:
Shayne M. Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
