Cases 1 - 10 of 650
Berry v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2024cv00766
Plaintiff:
Thomas Leonard Berry
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Honorable Judge Edmonds and District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baeza #341039 v. Unknown Parties
as 2:2024cv00970
Plaintiff:
Leonard Baeza
Defendant:
Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blockson v. Oliver
as 2:2024cv00809
Petitioner:
Christopher Leonard Blockson
Respondent:
Ronald Oliver and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Berry v. Wallace et al
as 6:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Thomas Leonard Berry
Defendant:
Wallace, Dirkson, Garibay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scaggs v. USA
as 3:2024cv00528
Petitioner:
Leonard Scaggs
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Winfrey v. Brittany
as 3:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Leonard Winfrey
Defendant:
Brittany
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winfrey v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Leonard Winfrey
Defendant:
Melissa Mitchell, Gaylene Fukagawa, Vanessa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sammeiso Leonard Lewis v. Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2024cv01293
Defendant:
David W. Slayton, Gavin Newsom, Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles and others
Plaintiff:
Sammeiso Leonard Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
