Cases 1 - 10 of 662
Donald E. Booker v. M. Welch et al
as 2:2024cv02237
Plaintiff:
Donald E. Booker
Defendant:
Officer M. Welch, Officer Parra and Officer J. Medina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donald L. Booker v. M. Welch et al
as 2:2024cv02324
Plaintiff:
Donald L. Booker
Defendant:
M. Welch, R. Parrg and J. Medina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Khan v. Stricklin et al
as 5:2024cv00717
Defendant:
Jenee Reed, Robin Stricklin, Sean Tumacder and others
Plaintiff:
Khan Muhammad and Muhammad Khan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medina v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2024cv00258
Petitioner:
Albert Medina
Respondent:
State of Nevada, James Scally and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Medina v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00111
Petitioner:
Bryant Medina
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Medina #268030 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Dominic Alfred Medina
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Unknown Girke, Unknown Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Alacanta et al
as 4:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Mario Jones
Defendant:
Unknown Alacanta, Unknown Felix, Unknown Medina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
(PC) Donley v. Wellpath et al
as 1:2023cv01740
Plaintiff:
Shawn Arlin Donley
Defendant:
Wellpath, Gustavian, Medina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Reichard et al
as 2:2023cv01812
Plaintiff:
Ray Clarence Rogers
Defendant:
L Reichard, Taylor, Michael Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gastelum-Medina v. Cain
as 2:2023cv01713
Petitioner:
Roger Gastelum-Medina
Respondent:
Brad Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
