Cases 1 - 10 of 76
Noe Moreno v. Brian Cates
as 2:2023cv08676
Petitioner:
Noe Moreno
Respondent:
Brian Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Noe v. Penzone et al
as 2:2023cv01136
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Darlene Noe
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office and Maricopa County Estrella Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Pineda-Castro v. Warden, FCI Herlong
as 2:2023cv00490
Petitioner:
Noe Pineda-Castro
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Herlong and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Mark Brown, et al v. Alfred Guinee, et al
as 22-15426
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK DAVID BROWN and VERNON EDWARD PELTZ, in his sole, and separate right
Defendant / Appellee:
ALFRED B. GUINEE, both individually and in his official capacity, ERIC P. HATCH, both individually and in his official capacity, MICHAEL A. KISBAUGH, both individually and in his official capacity and others
Lugo v. USA
as 3:2021cv01211
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Noe Rene Lugo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00255
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Samuels v. Miller et al
as 2:2020cv02264
Defendant:
Marchele Renee Miller, Jamil Trevon Curd, Christopher J Parese and others
Plaintiff:
Ewing Redmond Samuels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. Madden et al
as 3:2020cv02147
Plaintiff:
Donivan Diaz
Defendant:
Rhonda A. Bumgart, Noe Telles, D. Loop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Noe Hernandez v. Raymond Madden
as 2:2020cv04730
Respondent:
Raymond Madden
Petitioner:
Noe Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Noe Hernandez v. Warden
as 2:2020cv04143
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
Noe Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
