Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Albert Brinkman v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 16-16423
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALBERT L. BRINKMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, T. WADE, Corrections Officer III at Buckley at Lewis, HERNANDEZ, Corrections Officer III at Buckley at Lewis and others
Fitzgerald v. Superior Court of California County of San Diego et al
as 3:2015cv02161
Petitioner:
Conrad Leonard Fitzgerald
Respondent:
Superior Court of California County of San Diego, Lewis Lantz, N. Oskow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brinkman v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv01902
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Chris Moody, R Dorsey and others
Plaintiff:
Albert L Brinkman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brinkman #133444 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv01809
Plaintiff:
Albert L Brinkman
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, T Wade, Unknown Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shirts v. Rodriguez et al
as 4:2015cv05066
Plaintiff:
Jason Shirts
Defendant:
B Rodriguez, J Neau and Shapiro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shore v. Warner et al
as 4:2015cv05044
Plaintiff:
Darren C Shore
Defendant:
Bernie Warner, Washington State Department of Corrections, G Steven Hammond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brinkman #133444 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv00827
Plaintiff:
Albert L Brinkman
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Regina Dorsey, Norm T Wyford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Eleri v. Los Angeles Police Department et al
as 2:2014cv00325
Defendant:
J. Arellano, J. Arellano, J. Colon and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Eleri
Howard J Edwards v. Michael Leibrecht et al
as 5:2011cv01106
Defendant:
Does, Michael Leibrecht, David A Shapiro and others
Plaintiff:
Howard J Edwards
Charles Wang v. Tanyan Smith, et al
as 10-15768
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES WANG
Respondent - Appellee:
TANYAN SMITH, KENNETH SHAPIRO, Judge, ADMIR ALUM, Asst. D.A. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
