Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Sellards-Reck v Shook et al
as 3:2023cv05516
Petitioner:
Cassandra Sellards-Reck
Respondent:
David Shook, Christine Pomeroy, Jon Pound and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shook v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00099
Plaintiff:
Paul Edward Shook, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Shook v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
Paul Edward Shook, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dobbs v. Doe et al
as 6:2022cv01847
Plaintiff:
Eric Allen Dobbs
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Sgt. Branch, G. Shook MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thornton v. Oregon Department of Corrections Health Services et al
as 3:2022cv00925
Plaintiff:
James Thornton
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections Health Services, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Phoenix Police Department et al
as 2:2021cv00464
Defendant:
Justin Painter, Anthony Fink, Phoenix Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lamont Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Shook v. Ivy
as 4:2020cv00041
Plaintiff:
Paul Edward Shook, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Ivy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shook v. Ryan et al
as 2:2019cv04905
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles L Ryan
Petitioner:
Casey Leon Shook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Paul Dixon Lewis v. CRC Warden et al
as 2:2018cv06937
Defendant:
CRC Warden, J. W. Moss, Veronica Piper and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Dixon Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry Lagmay v. Shelley Nobriga, et al
as 17-16109
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HENRY LAGMAY
Defendant - Appellee:
SHELLEY NOBRIGA, NOLAN P. ESPINDA, Warden, FRANCIS SEQUEIRA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
