Cases 1 - 10 of 81
Sloan v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
as 2:2024cv01365
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
Plaintiff:
Joann Renee Sloan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rueda v. Salem Hospital et al
as 2:2023cv01914
Plaintiff:
Ivan Cortes Rueda
Defendant:
Salem Hospital, Andrew J. Cleary, Corby W. Makin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Sloan v. Cisneros et al
as 1:2023cv00699
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lee Sloan, Jr.
Defendant:
T. Cisneros, P. Llamas, S. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sloan v. State of Washington
as 2:2023cv00124
Petitioner:
George Sloan
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sloan et al v. Cyprus Amax Mineral Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv00104
Plaintiff:
Eli Sloan, Isaac Sloan, Chris Sloan and others
Defendant:
Cyprus Amax Mineral Corporation, Dodge Phelps Corporation, Freeport McMoran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sloan v. Nance et al
as 2:2023cv00019
Plaintiff:
George Sloan
Defendant:
Allen Nance, Steve Larson, Greg Curtis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sloan Stanley v. Bob Ferguson, et al
as 22-35757
Petitioner / Appellant:
SLOAN PATRICK STANLEY
Respondent / Appellee:
BOB FERGUSON, Attorney General, JEFFREY A. UTTECHT, Warden, Superintendent and KEVIN HANSON, Sgt.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv05337
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sloan Stanley v. Mason County Jail, et al
as 22-35660
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SLOAN PATRICK STANLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
MASON COUNTY JAIL and KEVIN HANSON, Mason County Jail Chief
Eli Sloan v. USA
as 22-15610
Petitioner / Appellant:
ELI SLOAN
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
