Cases 1 - 10 of 6,913
Hayes v. Barnum et al
as 1:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Hayes
Defendant:
Randall S. Barnum, Ada County, Ada County Public Defenders Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Drake v. Campbell
as 1:2024cv00651
Plaintiff:
Earl David Drake
Defendant:
T. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Bolin v. Newcomb et al
as 1:2024cv00644
Petitioner:
Paul C. Bolin
Respondent:
Rachael Newcomb and T. Falkenbarg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Bolin v. Newcomb et al
as 2:2024cv01534
Petitioner:
Paul C. Bolin
Respondent:
Rachael Newcomb and T. Falkenberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mrozek v. Eaton et al
as 3:2024cv03324
Plaintiff:
Bradley James Mrozek
Defendant:
Warden Patrick Eaton, CDCR Director Ron Broomfield, Voc. Instructor T. Ismans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patterson v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
Eugene P Patterson
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Patterson v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Eugene P Patterson
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hayes v. State of Idaho
as 1:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
Michael T Hayes
Defendant:
State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cedric Garnett Johnson v. Travis Pennington et al
as 5:2024cv00678
Plaintiff:
Cedric Garnett Johnson
Defendant:
Travis Pennington, D. Mortimer, D. Tristan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
