Cases 1 - 10 of 834
Thompson v. Washington et al
as 2:2024cv00779
Plaintiff:
Solomon Xavier Thompson
Defendant:
Department of Enterprise Corrections Division, Brian Washington, Keri Walters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Gregory v. Lundy
as 2:2024cv01323
Petitioner:
Charles Walter Gregory
Respondent:
Leanna Lundy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin v. Tewalt
as 1:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Walter B. Martin
Defendant:
Josh Tewalt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox #095548 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00705
Plaintiff:
Walter John Cox, Jr.
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Charles L Ryan, Lori Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeil v. Gittere et al
as 3:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Michael McNeil
Defendant:
William Gittere, Walter Romero, Tasheena Cooke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Adair v. Nakken et al
as 2:2024cv00578
Plaintiff:
James Franklin Adair
Defendant:
Joshua Nakken, Villalobos, Judy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walter Reginald Beasley, Jr. v. Tammy L. Campbell
as 5:2024cv00559
Petitioner:
Walter Reginald Beasley, Jr.
Respondent:
Tammy L. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Purkhiser v. Steyh et al
as 4:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Walter Jason Purkhiser
Defendant:
Shelly Steyh and C/O Cepeda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Smith v. Dharawat et al
as 2:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Robert L Smith
Defendant:
Ramesh Dharawat, J Ma, Walter Chien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ash v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2023cv02473
Plaintiff:
Arthur Ash
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of and Seth Walters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
