Cases 21 - 30 of 115
Nathan Christensen v. Carter's Retail, Inc. et al
as 8:2020cv00776
Plaintiff:
Nathan Christensen
Defendant:
Carter's Retail, Inc. and Does 1 through 50, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Calsyn v. Dickey & Associate PLLC et al
as 4:2019cv00578
Plaintiff:
Lorraine Calsyn
Defendant:
Dickey & Associate PLLC, Carter Dickey and Marveen H Dickey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carter v. Railworks Track Systems Inc
as 3:2019cv05625
Plaintiff:
John Carter
Defendant:
Railworks Track Systems Inc
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4323
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2019cv01056
Plaintiff:
John Carter
Defendant:
Railworks Track Systems Inc
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4323
Carter v. Golden Gate Freightliner Inc
as 3:2019cv02034
Defendant:
Golden Gate Freightliner Inc
Plaintiff:
Stephen Carter, II
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Carter v. Honeywell International Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv01417
Plaintiff:
Connie Carter
Defendant:
Honeywell International Incorporated and Honeywell Retirement Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
MacEllven et al v. Rainier School District No. 13 et al
as 3:2017cv01815
Defendant:
Robert Michael Carter, Laurie Kash and Rainier School District No. 13
Plaintiff:
Michelle Eastham and Terrianne MacEllven
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Grady et al v. CenturyLink Communications, LLC
as 1:2015cv00085
Plaintiff:
Derek H. Virkus, Gail L. Sherrick, Alma Natalia Noot and others
Defendant:
CenturyLink Communications, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Darryl Carter v. Rasier-CA, LLC, et al
as 17-17278
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
RASIER-CA, LLC, TRAVIS KALANICK and UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Carter v. Uber Technologies et al
as 3:2017cv00003
Plaintiff:
Darryl Carter
Defendant:
Rasier-CA, LLC , Travis Kalanick and Uber Technologies
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
