Cases 91 - 100 of 614
Willie Farfan v. Shannon Dicus et al
as 5:2022cv00845
Plaintiff:
Willie Farfan
Defendant:
Shannon Dicus, John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00557
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Calvin v. Boe et al
as 3:2022cv05217
Plaintiff:
Donald Calvin
Defendant:
Jeri Boe, Evans, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abanoob Mounir Malak v. San Bernardino County Sheriff Department et al
as 5:2022cv00514
Plaintiff:
John Doe and Abanoob Mounir Malak
Defendant:
San Bernardino County Sheriff Department, West Valley Detention Center, Cathy Alis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Multnomah County Sheriff et al
as 3:2022cv00429
Plaintiff:
Edward Bailey
Defendant:
Multnomah County Sheriff, Michael Reese, CPT. Eric P. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01559
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Rogers v. Clark County Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv05064
Plaintiff:
Daryl Rogers
Defendant:
Clark County Corrections, Clark County, Clark County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Doe #1, et al v. Twitter, Inc.
as 22-15103
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOHN DOE #1 and JOHN DOE #2
Defendant / Appellant:
TWITTER, INC.
John Doe #1, et al v. Twitter, Inc.
as 22-15104
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN DOE #1 and JOHN DOE #2
Defendant / Appellee:
TWITTER, INC.
Garcia Chavez v. United States of America et al
as 3:2022cv00107
Plaintiff:
Sotero Garcia Chavez
Defendant:
United States of America, Washington County, Hayden J Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
