Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 181 - 190 of 428
O'Conner v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 3:2017cv02906
Plaintiff: Kenneth O'Conner
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and NBS Default Services, LLC,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Darrell Conners v. USA
as 17-71253
Petitioner: DARRELL CONNERS
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Matthew O'Conner
as 2:2017rd00024
Plaintiff: Matthew O'Conner
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
The People of the State of California v. Davanthoni Lewrence Conners We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv01995
Defendant: Davanthoni Lewrence Conners
Plaintiff: The People of the State of California
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00707
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Conner v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv00545
Plaintiff: Lucille Conner
Defendant: C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maggie Conners v. David Alfred Tjarks et al
as 2:2017cv01245
Defendant: Honorable Judge Chemeleski, Honorable Judge Chemeleski, County of Los Angeles and others
Plaintiff: Maggie Conners
Conner v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv00336
Plaintiff: George Christopher Conner
Defendant: C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Enoch Conners v. Warden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00583
Indirect Purchaser Class, et al v. Panasonic Corporation, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-15065
: In re: OPTICAL DISK DRIVE PRODUCTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER CLASS
Objector - Appellant: CONNER ERWIN
Defendant - Appellee: PANASONIC CORPORATION, PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, NEC CORPORATION and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?