Cases 11 - 20 of 19,782
Gagne et al v. Mesa, City of et al
as 2:2024cv01337
Plaintiff:
Christopher Gagne and Suzette Gagne
Defendant:
Mesa, City of, Kevin Cost, Lee Rankin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03365
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mueller v. Ybarra et al
as 3:2024cv00897
Plaintiff:
Christopher Mueller
Defendant:
J. Ybarra, C.O. Lay, K. Hofman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mogan v. State Bar of California, et al.
as 24-3492
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MOGAN, ATTORNEY
Defendant:
STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, GEORGE CARDONA, in his official capacity as Chief Trial Counsel For the State Bar of California, and in his individual capacity, CHRISTOPHER JAGARD, in his official capacity as Deputy Chief Trial Counsel for the Office of the Chief Trial Counsel and in his individual capacity and others
Fregia v. Miranda, et al.
as 24-3501
Plaintiff:
MARK FREGIA
Defendant:
P.A. MIRANDA, SAVAGE and RIDGE
Koch v. City of Spokane, et al.
as 24-3485
Plaintiff:
MARK A. KOCH
Defendant:
CITY OF SPOKANE, a Municipality and SPOKANE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, a Municipality
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04596
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Taylor v. Brown
as 24-3441
Plaintiff:
JERMEL ARCILICIA TAYLOR, Genius, Melo and others
Defendant:
MARK D. BROWN
Mark David Spalenka v. David J. et al
as 8:2024cv01174
Plaintiff:
Mark David Spalenka
Defendant:
David J. Spalenka and Margie A. Spalenka
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
