Cases 11 - 20 of 2,339
Belmonte v. King County et al
as 2:2024cv00518
Plaintiff:
Damers Shirak Duranzan and David Belmonte
Defendant:
King County, King County Department of Public Defense, Anita Khandelwal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bens Market et al v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv01102
Plaintiff:
Bens Market and Adam Saif Ali Saleh
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
BENS MARKET, a California Sole Proprietorship et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024at00441
Plaintiff:
Bens Market and Adam Saif Ali Saleh
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Goldstein et al v. Henry et al
as 2:2024cv00786
Plaintiff:
Alex Goldstein, Scott Whittington and Armour LLC doing business as Redneck Wine Company
Defendant:
Ben Henry and Kris Mayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00748
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Bitah v. Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation
as 3:2024cv08067
Plaintiff:
Lula Ben Bitah
Defendant:
Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
Jackson v. Quick, et al.
as 24-1740
Plaintiff:
CORNEL JACKSON
Defendant:
JASON QUICK, Watch Commander at Madera County Jail, ELIZABETH ALVAREZ, CSU Officer at Madera County Jail, LISETTE LOPEZ, Mailroom Officer at Madera County Jail and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
