Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Caudill v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022at00690
Plaintiff:
Pat Darwin Caudill, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01424
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Sarrah Adams et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04959
Plaintiff:
Alicia Breeden, Jessica Campbell, Sarrah Adams and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Delbert Akers et al. v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04957
Plaintiff:
Delbert Akers, Mark Alcorn, Lori Alexander and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Schull et al v. Sevre et al
as 4:2022cv00030
Plaintiff:
Billie Schull, Larry Ludwig, Carl Orsborn and others
Defendant:
Zurich American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Caudill v. Hoodsport Winery Inc
as 3:2021cv05445
Defendant:
Hoodsport Winery Inc
Plaintiff:
Lois M Caudill and Lois Caudill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Jurado R. Reese v. Mel Red Recana et al
as 2:2021cv03633
Defendant:
Amrita B Walgampaya, Nikki Trumbo, Judge Gregory Keosian and others
Plaintiff:
Jurado R. Reese, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caudill v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv06196
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Teresa K Caudill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Caudill v. Saul
as 2:2020cv02148
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Darren D. Caudill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
(SS) Caudill v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv01163
Plaintiff:
Pat Darwin Caudill, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
