Cases 11 - 20 of 208
Johnson v. Sanchez et al
as 4:2022cv07858
Plaintiff:
Paul David Johnson
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Sanchez, Lieutenant Boise and R. Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul Johnson v. A. Cuevas, et al
as 22-16394
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
A. CUEVAS, RON DAVIS, T. ALLEN and others
Paul Johnson v. Thuddy, et al
as 22-16116
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
THUDDY, M.D., CMO, F. KREITLER, M.D., L. W. ROHLFING, M.D. and others
Steven Gregory et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04960
Plaintiff:
Colleen Meyer, Debra Mincher, Steven Gregory and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Johnson v. Rosalez et al
as 4:2022cv04091
Plaintiff:
Paul David Johnson
Defendant:
R. Rosalez, Sergeant A. Cuevas, S. Stribling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Sinel v. Genexa, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03961
Counter Defendant:
MICHAEL SINEL and MSSMD Investments, LLC
Counter Claimant:
GENEXA, INC., MAX SPIELBERG and DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant:
DOES 1 through 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
(PC) Johnson v. Unknown
as 1:2022cv00582
Plaintiff:
David Johnson
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re CIM-SQ Transfer Cases
as 3:2022mc80066
Plaintiff:
Charles Carter, Sr., Robert Lee Cole, Lovell Colvin and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Ron Broomfield, State of California and others
David Johnson v. Unknown
as 2:2022cv01251
Plaintiff:
David Johnson
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul Johnson v. Joseph Chudy, et al
as 22-15050
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH CHUDY, M.D., THUDDY, M.D., CMO, F. KREITLER, M.D. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
