Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Smith v. Tootell et al
as 5:2014cv01438
Plaintiff:
Jerry Eugene Smith
Defendant:
E. Tootell, M. Ogren and J. De La Cruz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Tootell et al
as 5:2014cv01159
Plaintiff:
Jerry Eugene Smith
Defendant:
E. Tootell, D. Reyes and L. D. Zamora
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Reyes et al
as 5:2014cv00403
Plaintiff:
Jerry Eugene Smith
Defendant:
D. Reyes, E. Tootell and J. DeLacruz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2013cv00940
Plaintiff:
Rodney Eugene Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, William Witherspoon, Terrence Hines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Chapell et al
as 5:2012cv04859
Plaintiff:
Jerry Eugene Smith
Defendant:
Kevin Chapell, M. Bloise and M. Chirila
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jerry E Stewart et al v. Brad Gates et al
as 2:1975cv03075
Defendant:
Robert W Battin, Ralph B Clark, Ralph A Diedrich and others
Plaintiff:
William Brown, Richard Eugene Smith, Jerry E Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Vail et al
as 2:2010cv05106
Plaintiff:
Eugene Smith, Sr
Defendant:
Eldon Vail, Steven Sinclair, V Gaines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re: Zicam Cold Remedy Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2009md02096
Plaintiff:
Nichelle Phillips, Mark Shapiro, Stewart Roper and others
Defendant:
Matrixx Initiatives Incorporated, Zicam LLC and Wal-Mart Stores Texas LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Smith v. Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv02070
Plaintiff:
Timothy Eugene Smith
Defendant:
Matrixx Initiatives, Inc., Zicam L.L.C. and Botanical Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
O'Dell Smith v. J. Woodford
as 09-16654
Petitioner - Appellant:
O'DELL EUGENE SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
J. S. WOODFORD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
