Cases 11 - 20 of 95
Engleka v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2020cv00925
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Plaintiff:
Frances Engleka
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
France v. Shinn et al
as 3:2020cv08075
Respondent:
David Shinn, Arizona, State and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Kory King France
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
IN RE: Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2015md02641
Plaintiff:
Vincent Dozier, Evelyn Rognstad, Shari Waggoner and others
Defendant:
Thomas Bauer, Allegheny General Hospital, C.R. Bard Incorporated and others
Special Master:
Marina Corodemus
In Re:
Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Grabowski v. Arizona Board of Regents et al
as 4:2019cv00460
Defendant:
Hannah Vivian Peterson, Benjamin James Crawford, Carlos Villarreal and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Grabowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv05236
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Quiroz-Montano v. Arizona Child Protective Services
as 2:2019cv04784
Plaintiff:
Dechoal Marie Quiroz-Montano
Defendant:
Arizona Child Protective Services, Marcy Ferrell, Margaret Frances Quiroz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aleksiejczyk v. Penzone
as 2:2019cv02798
Plaintiff:
Veronica Frances Aleksiejczyk
Defendant:
Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson et al v. Monsanto Company
as 2:2019cv01931
Plaintiff:
Marvin N Patterson and Frances Patterson
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
