Cases 11 - 20 of 52
Dixon v. Diaz et al
as 4:2022cv02322
Plaintiff:
Gregory J. Dixon
Defendant:
Ralph Diaz, DIrector CDCR Kathleen Allison, Warden Ron Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re CIM-SQ Transfer Cases
as 3:2022mc80066
Plaintiff:
Charles Carter, Sr., Robert Lee Cole, Lovell Colvin and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Ron Broomfield, State of California and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv05910
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Hollis v. Allison et al
as 5:2021cv04974
Defendant:
B. Maub, J Arnold, Ron Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Ellis Clay Hollis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Payne v. Diana Marsteiner, et al
as 21-55296
Defendant / Appellee:
DIANA MARSTEINER, Judge, Individual and official capacity, JOHN DUNK, State Fund Attorney, Individual and official capacity, MITCHELL GEIGER, Qualified Medical Examiner and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD PAYNE
Ossie Giles v. Ron Davis, et al
as 21-15466
Defendant / Appellee:
J. KNIGHT, F. JAUGAN, C.O., J. SANGMASTER, Sgt. and others
Defendant:
M. NELSON
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OSSIE GILES
Lee v. Allison et al
as 4:2021cv01633
Defendant:
A. Pachynski, T.R. Teixeira, J Arnold and others
Plaintiff:
Wilbert H Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jason J Arnold et al v. FCA US LLC et al
as 2:2021cv01996
Defendant:
Orange Coast Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram, FCA US LLC and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Jason J Arnold and Melissa L Arnold
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Product Liability
Ham v. Allison et al
as 4:2021cv00909
Defendant:
Dr. Joseph Bick, Sergeant M. Bloise, Ralph Diaz and others
Plaintiff:
Bill Ham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rubio v. Allison et al
as 4:2021cv00921
Defendant:
Dr. Joseph Bick, T.R. Teixeira, Clarence Cryer and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Louis Rubio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
