Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Nido et al v. Ericsson, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv06194
Plaintiff:
Reinier Catapang, Celes Nido, Aristides Amano and others
Defendant:
4G Project People, Inc. and Ericsson, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Nguyen v. Ericsson, Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv06453
Plaintiff:
John Nguyen
Defendant:
Ericsson, Inc. , 4G Project People, Inc. , Networkers, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nicol v. Ka'anapali Golf Estates Community Association, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00251
Plaintiff:
Todd Nicol , Jack Riley , David Murray and others
Defendant:
Ka'anapali Golf Estates Community Association, Inc. , Steven Scott, Jonathan Aber and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv03581
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
John Nguyen v. Kathleen Dickenson
as 13-16503
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN NGUYEN
Respondent - Appellee:
KATHLEEN DICKENSON
Nguyen v. Hill
as 2:2012cv01357
Petitioner:
John Nguyen
Respondent:
Rick Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nguyen v. Hill
as 2:2012cv00493
Petitioner:
John Nguyen
Respondent:
Rick Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nguyen v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & Explosives
as 2:2011cv01699
Respondent:
Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms & Explosives and United States of America
Petitioner:
John Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 781
Nguyen v. Dickinson
as 5:2011cv03324
Petitioner:
John Nguyen
Respondent:
Kathleen Dickinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Robert Martinez v. L. Donaldson, et al
as 10-17200
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT MARTINEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
L. DONALDSON, CDCR Legal Analysis Processing Unit, in his Official and Individual capacities, JAMES TILTON, In his official and individual capacities, ELLIOTT POWE, CDCR Parole Agent, in his official and individual capacities and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
