Cases 11 - 20 of 44
Joseph William Morales v. James Robinson
as 5:2023cv00007
Petitioner:
Joseph William Morales
Respondent:
James Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Darius Butler v. USDC-SAC
as 22-70247
Not Classified By Court:
In re: DARIUS BUTLER, J. CLARK KELSO, RICHARD KIRKLAND and others
Petitioner:
DARIUS BUTLER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
(PC) Butler v. Kelso et al
as 2:2022cv01301
Plaintiff:
Darius Butler
Defendant:
J. Clark Kelso, Richard Kirkland, Lisa Heintz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Williams v. City of Sparks et al
as 3:2022cv00197
Plaintiff:
Joseph Williams
Defendant:
City of Sparks, Christopher Bare, Christopher Rowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Corizon Incorporated et al
as 1:2022cv00051
Plaintiff:
Joseph Williams
Defendant:
Corizon Incorporated and Director IDOC Josh Tewalt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joseph William Ramirez v. Clark
as 5:2021cv00513
Petitioner:
Joseph William Ramirez
Respondent:
Warden Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Joseph Hart v. Ron Broomfield
as 20-99011
Respondent / Appellee:
RON BROOMFIELD, Acting Warden, California State Prison at San Quentin
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSEPH WILLIAM HART
(PS) Novak v. Mendez et al
as 2:2020cv01721
Plaintiff:
Joseph William Novak
Defendant:
Amerihome Mortgage Company, LLC, Tina M. Mendez and Prober & Raphael, ALC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Ackerman v. Smith et al
as 3:2018cv06773
Defendant:
Sheriff Laurie Smith and Dr. Emily Wilhelm
Plaintiff:
Joseph William Ackerman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gillin v. Skuletich et al
as 2:2017cv00042
Petitioner:
Joseph William Gillin
Respondent:
George Skuletich and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
