Cases 11 - 20 of 68
Jones v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 4:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation doing business as Amtrak, BNSF Railway Company, Nordby and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Jones v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2022cv03137
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Henle v. County of El Dorado et al
as 2:2022at00350
Plaintiff:
Kelsey Henle
Defendant:
County of El Dorado, Evan Vaughan, Michael Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Henle v. County of El Dorado et al
as 2:2022cv00596
Plaintiff:
Kelsey Henle
Defendant:
County of El Dorado, Evan Vaughan, Michael Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05728
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jones v. Legrand
as 3:2020cv03688
Plaintiff:
Franklin Michael Jones
Defendant:
Bertrand Paul Legrand
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Calkins et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2020cv01884
Plaintiff:
Brian F. McMorris, Felix Jones, Nena Walby and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Steven Rupp, et al v. Xavier Becerra
as 19-56004
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER SEIFERT, MICHAEL JONES, CALIFORNIA RIFLE & PISTOL ASSOCIATION, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California
Abdeljabbar et al v. Lyft, Inc.
as 3:2018cv07482
Plaintiff:
Odeh Abdeljabbar, Eder Berganza, Dexter Baldridge II and others
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc.
Nuvasive Inc. v. Jones et al
as 3:2018cv02373
Defendant:
Kenneth Kormanis and Michael Jones
Plaintiff:
Nuvasive Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Alphatec Spine, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
