Cases 11 - 20 of 143
(PC) Fowler v. Miller et al
as 2:2023cv00248
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Fowler
Defendant:
Miller, J. Begines and Bieniaviaes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Trisler et al
as 1:2022cv00559
Plaintiff:
Jason Ray Clark
Defendant:
Michael Ray Trisler, Brian Paul Trisler, Steven Wayne Trisler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Michael Ray Bredemier v. Theresa Cisneros
as 5:2022cv02016
Appellant:
Michael Ray Bredemier
Respondent:
Theresa Cisneros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Ray Pitre v. B. Birkholz
as 2:2022cv07956
Petitioner:
Michael Ray Pitre
Respondent:
B. Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ray et al v. Conservice, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv01442
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray, Britni Georgianna and Roes 1 through 100, inclusive
Defendant:
Conservice, LLC and Does 1 through 10,000
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 nr Notice of Removal
Swanson v. DOJ et al
as 6:2022cv01304
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Swanson and Michael Swanson
Defendant:
DOJ, Michael Mosman, Youlee Yim You and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
State 48 Recycling Incorporated v. Janes et al
as 2:2022cv00767
Plaintiff:
State 48 Recycling Incorporated
Defendant:
Michael Ray Janes, Unknown Janes, Angel J Alva and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Watts v. Novak
as 1:2022cv00512
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Watts
Defendant:
Logan Novak, Deputy Steven Josephson, Corporal Kellan Feyerharm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fuqua #215717 v. Unknown Party
as 3:2022cv08018
Petitioner:
Michael Ray Fuqua
Respondent:
David Shinn, Unknown Party and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Michael Swanson v. USA
as 21-35779
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY SWANSON
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
