Cases 11 - 20 of 48
Poder in Action et al v. Phoenix, City of
as 2:2020cv01429
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of
Plaintiff:
Poder in Action, Arizona Dream Act Coalition and Aurora Galan Mejia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Montgomery v. Mazzei et al
as 4:2020cv00244
Defendant:
Unknown Mattes, Unknown Picone, Unknown Farris and others
Plaintiff:
Kyle Lee Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00654
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mejia v. Juul Labs Incorporated et al
as 3:2019cv08334
Defendant:
Juul Labs Incorporated and Pax Labs Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Omar Mejia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv04453
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
High v. Pima County Jail et al
as 4:2018cv00474
Defendant:
Unknown Lariza, Arizona, State of, Unknown Parties and others
Plaintiff:
Harold Lee High, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia et al v. MCA Financial Group Limited
as 2:2018mc00042
Plaintiff:
William Shelton, Aaron Dunning, James Stephens and others
Defendant:
MCA Financial Group Limited
Respondent:
MidCap Financial Trust and MidCap Funding X Trust
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Mejia v. Cavalry Portfolio Services LLC
as 2:2018cv00313
Plaintiff:
Alexis A Mejia
Defendant:
Cavalry Portfolio Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2017cv04180
Plaintiff:
David Mejia Sanchez
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Paul Penzone, Fulton Brock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez #147145 v. Encinas et al
as 2:2017cv01825
Defendant:
Unknown Encinas, Ruth Tenierro, Christine M Salas and others
Plaintiff:
Angel Javier Lovitt Zeta Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
