Cases 11 - 20 of 55
Stevens v. Mendocino County Superior Court
as 3:2021cv07604
Petitioner:
Dean Michael Stevens
Respondent:
Mendocino County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Stevens v. Aaren et al
as 5:2021cv05531
Plaintiff:
Dean Michael Stevens
Defendant:
Jeffry Aaren, Mary LeClarr, City of Mendocino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Gorbey v. IRS, et al
as 21-16078
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Fresno
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL STEVEN GORBEY
Gorbey v. Internal Revenue Service, Fresno et al
as 1:2021cv00320
Defendant:
United States and Internal Revenue Service, Fresno
Plaintiff:
Michael Steven Gorbey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Tharpe et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2020cv06033
Plaintiff:
William L. Pokryfke, Tony D. Woods, Karin Jeffress and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Ayers et al
as 2:2020cv01607
Defendant:
Unknown Ayers, Taylor Ashley Ayers, Unknown Kelley and others
Plaintiff:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Quimby v. Pinnacle Heavy Haul, Inc.
as 2:2019cv02181
Defendant:
Pinnacle Heavy Haul, Inc., Pinnacle Transportation Systems, Inc. and Michael Stevens
Plaintiff:
Ruth Quimby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Foster v. Von Blanckensee
as 4:2019cv00300
Petitioner:
Michael Steven Foster
Respondent:
Barbara Von Blanckensee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wright v. United States of America
as 1:2018cv00377
Petitioner:
Michael Steven Wright
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Michael Stevens et al v. HD Supply Management, Inc.
as 2:2018cv04792
Defendant:
DOES and HD Supply Management, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mark Littleford, Michael Littleford and Michael Stevens
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
