Cases 11 - 20 of 81
Maldonado v. Pima, County of et al
as 4:2023cv00521
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Maldonado
Defendant:
Pima, County of, Chris Nanos, Aimee Conway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Turner v. Pima County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2023cv00315
Plaintiff:
Tobias Jay Turner
Defendant:
Pima County Sheriff's Department, Chris Nanos, Matthew Ranson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Tucson Police Department et al
as 4:2023cv00300
Plaintiff:
Lyle Anthony Hernandez
Defendant:
Tucson Police Department, Pima County Sheriff's Department, Pima County Adult Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. Nanos et al
as 4:2023cv00288
Plaintiff:
Terrence Franklin
Defendant:
Chris Nanos and NaphCare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Enabnit v. Nanos
as 4:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
John Eugene Enabnit
Defendant:
Chris Nanos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warren v. Nanos et al
as 4:2023cv00254
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lee Warren
Defendant:
Chris Nanos, Laura Conover, Samantha Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniella Gracia v. Mark Napier, et al
as 23-15831
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIELLA MARIE GRACIA
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK NAPIER, Pima County Sheriff, OFELIA DORSEY, #7531, Correctional Officer, WILLIAM GRIMSEY, #6095, Correctional Sergeant and others
Lara-Sanchez v. Garland
as 23-996
Petitioner:
NANO LARA-SANCHEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Lawson v. Pima, County of et al
as 4:2023cv00082
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Lawson
Defendant:
Pima, County of, Pima County Sheriff's Department, Chris Nanos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
