Cases 11 - 20 of 54
Robert Stewart Jordan v. Neil McDowell
as 5:2015cv01000
Petitioner:
Robert Stewart Jordan
Respondent:
Neil McDowell
Stewart v. Warner et al
as 3:2015cv05243
Plaintiff:
Michael Robert Stewart
Defendant:
Bernard Warner, Don Holbrook, V Holenvinski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carlie Spiers, et al v. GlaxoSmithKline
as 13-80197
Plaintiff - Respondent:
CARLIE SPIERS, SANDRA WALKER, EVELYN WYATT and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, AKA SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Spiers et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv03046
Plaintiff:
Carlie Spiers , Sandra Walker , Evelyn Wyatt and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Robert Jordan v. David Long
as 13-55244
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT STEWART JORDAN
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID LONG
Stewart v. Warner et al
as 2:2013cv05011
Plaintiff:
Michael Robert Stewart
Defendant:
Bernard Warner and Steve Sinclair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Robert Stewart Jordan v. David Long
as 5:2012cv02030
Petitioner:
Robert Stewart Jordan
Respondent:
David Long
Glen Palmer, et al v. ADOC, et al
as 12-16340
Plaintiff - Appellee:
D. L., a minor child, GLENDA PALMER, individually as the surviving mother and personal represenative of Timothy L. Lucero deceased estate of Timothy L. Lucero and LEROY L. LUCERO, Sr.
Defendant - Appellant:
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ROBERT STEWART, warden of ASPC Eyman, UNKNOWN STEWART, named as Jane Doe Stewart, his wife and others
Raymond Rigsby v. State of Arizona, et al
as 12-15334
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND EARL RIGSBY
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF ARIZONA, JANET NAPOLITANO, JANICE K. BREWER and others
Robert Stewart et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 2:2012cv00955
Defendant:
DePuy Inc, DePuy Orthopaedics Inc, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Mildred Stewart and Robert Stewart
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
