Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Cain et al v. Salish Kootenai College et al
as 9:2012cv00181
Plaintiff:
Fawn Cain , Tanya Archer and Sandi Ovitt
Defendant:
Robert Fouty , Jim Durglo , Rene Peirre and others
Amicu:
Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Paul E Marshall Sr v. City of Los Angeles California et al
as 2:2012cv09003
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles California, LAPD-Union, State of California and others
Plaintiff:
Paul E Marshall, Sr
Swaney et al v. Lowe's HIW, Inc.
as 3:2011cv03231
Plaintiff:
Charleen Swaney and Joseph Sarasua
Defendant:
Lowe's HIW, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Swaney et al v. Lowe's HIW, Inc.
as 2:2011cv01151
Plaintiff:
Charleen Swaney and Joseph Sarasua
Defendant:
Lowe's HIW, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Swaney v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 2:2011cv01129
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Charleen Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: Payless Shoesource, Inc., California Song-Beverly Credit Card Act Litigation
as 2:2009md02022
Plaintiff:
Michael Swaney, Michael Swaney and Michael Swaney
Defendant:
Payless Shoesource, Inc, Payless Shoesource, Inc and Payless Shoesource, Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Swaney v. Payless Shoesource, Inc
as 2:2008cv02672
Plaintiff:
Michael Swaney, Michael Swaney and Michael Swaney
Defendant:
Payless Shoesource, Inc, Payless Shoesource, Inc and Payless Shoesource, Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Harms v. Novatel Wireless, Inc., et al
as 3:2008cv01714
Plaintiff:
Matthew Harms
Defendant:
Novatel Wireless, Inc., George B Weinhert, Kenneth G Leddon and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Backe v. Novatel Wireless, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv01689
Plaintiff:
Maureen Backe
Defendant:
Novatel Wireless, Inc., George Weinert, Dan Halvorson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. Swaney
as 07-16770
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARREL LEE SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
J SWANEY, Sergeant; GOLD, Lieutenant; BESS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
