Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Williams v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. et al
as 3:2009cv00020
Plaintiff:
David M. Williams
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co., Deere & Company, Tecumseh Products Company and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Michel et al v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. et al
as 2:2008cv01682
Plaintiff:
Michael W Michel, Michael W Michel, Ann Tracey and others
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co., Deere & Company, Tecumseh Products Company and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brey, et al v. Sears Roebuck and Co., et al
as 2:2008cv02004
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck and Co, Deere & Company, Tecumseh Products Company and others
Plaintiff:
William B. Brey and Scott Friedson
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Murphy et al v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. et al
as 1:2008cv00460
Plaintiff:
Tracy Murphy and Philip H Gordon
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co., Deere & Company, Tecumseh Products Company and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Doppler et al v. Sears, Roebuck & Company et al
as 9:2008cv00123
Plaintiff:
Kenneth J. Doppler and Dave Kastet
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck & Company, Deere and Company, Tecumseh Products Company and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Phillips v. Sears, Roebuck and Company et al
as 4:2008cv02671
Plaintiff:
Carl Phillips, Carl Phillips, Carl Phillips and others
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Company, Deere & Company, Tecumseh Products Company and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
In Re: Western States Wholesale Natural Gas Antitrust Litigation (MDL 1566)
as 2:2003cv01431
Defendant:
RRI Energy Services, Inc., AEP Energy Services, Inc., American Electric Power Company, Inc. and others
In Re:
Western States Wholesale Natural Gas Antitrust Litigation
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Carthage College and Briggs and Stratton Corporation
Plaintiff:
A.L. Gilbert Company, Abelman Art Glass, Auila, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
