Cases 11 - 20 of 1,680
Scott v. O' Malley
as 3:2024cv01154
Plaintiff:
Tammie Deann Scott
Defendant:
Martin O' Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 id Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Gillespie v. O'Malley
as 9:2024cv00095
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Tammy Gillespie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Johnson v. Social Security
as 2:2024cv01156
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Defendant:
Commissioner Of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Tammi J. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Edward James Harris v. Tammy Campbell
as 5:2024cv01306
Respondent:
Tammy Campbell
Petitioner:
Edward James Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00309
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Estate of Tammy Ann Cuneo v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00865
Plaintiff:
Estate of Tammy Ann Cuneo
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Beal v. Gritstone bio, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv03640
Petitioner:
Richard Rodriguez, Jessica Corrigan and Alexander Houlihan
Defendant:
Andrew R. Allen, Gritstone bio, Inc. and Vassiliki Economides
Plaintiff:
Tammy Beal
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2024cv00859
Defendant:
United State of America
Plaintiff:
Estate of Tammy Ann Cuneo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
(PC) Estate of Vicent Frank Boscaino, Jr. et al v. Adventist Health Hanford et al
as 1:2024cv00689
Defendant:
Tammy Campbell, Daniel Linares, California Correctional Health Care Services and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Boscaino, Roy Boscaino, Susan Moss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
