Cases 11 - 20 of 125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv01466
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Klamath Forest Alliance et al v. Tom Vilsack et al
as 1:2022cv00180
Plaintiff:
Klamath Forest Alliance, applegate neighborhood network, Luke Ruediger and others
Defendant:
Sec of Dept of Agri Tom Vilsack, United States Department of Agriculture and Tom Vilsack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Thornton v. Smart et al
as 6:2021cv01509
Plaintiff:
Brian Thornton
Defendant:
Matt Smart, Tom Beck, Jon Zwemke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00973
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00603
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Joudrey-Neahen v. Purple Sky, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00576
Defendant:
Tom Robinson, Purple Sky, LLC and Lisa Robinson
Plaintiff:
Denise Joudrey-Neahen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Black Unity et al v. City of Springfield et al
as 6:2021cv00346
Defendant:
Bronson Durrant, John Doe, Sgt. David Grice and others
Plaintiff:
Martin Allums, Black Unity, Mya Lansing and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. La Franchi
as 6:2021cv00033
Plaintiff:
Tom Simmons
Defendant:
Ronald La Franchi an individual doing business as Ron's Oil Company doing business as Pozzi Dairy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv02031
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Tefincom S.A. v. Vadala
as 3:2020cv01470
Defendant:
Kevin Vadala and Tom Spark
Plaintiff:
Tefincom S.A. a Panama corporation doing business as NordVPN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
