Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Theriot v. U.S. District Judges of Michigan et al
as 2:2019cv00195
Defendant:
Judge Magistrate Timothy P Greeley, Judge Unknown Siler, Judge Gordon J Quist and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Theriot
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott Stafne v. Thomas Zilly, et al
as 19-35454
Defendant / Appellee:
BARRY G. SILVERMAN, Circuit Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, THOMAS S. ZILLY, U.S. District Court Judge, JOHN C. COUGHENOUR, U.S. District Court Judge and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SCOTT ERIK STAFNE
Gillenwater v. Suko et al
as 2:2018cv00263
Defendant:
Lonny R Suko, Joseph H Harrington, John T Rodgers and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Lee Gillenwater
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lantz Jackson v. U.S. Court of Appeals
as 18-71638
Petitioner:
LANTZ LEVELLE JACKSON, AKA Lantz Jackson
Respondent:
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
Jackson v. U.S. Court of Appeals
as 2:2018cv02090
Petitioner:
Lantz Jackson
Respondent:
U.S. Court of Appeals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Henry Lagmay v. F. Nakakuni, et al
as 18-15746
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HENRY LAGMAY
Defendant - Appellee:
F. NAKAKUNI, JAN, Mrs., D. K. WATSON and others
Glenn v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2017cv01376
Plaintiff:
Melree Larea Glenn
Defendant:
State of Oregon and U.S. Court of Appeals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jason Harris v. Molly Dwyer, et al
as 17-16474
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON LEE HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
MOLLY C. DWYER, Clerk, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and SEAN M. RODRIGUEZ, Deputy Clerk
Juan Vianez v. Clerk U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
as 2:2013cv08633
Defendant:
Clerk U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Plaintiff:
Juan Vianez
Emmett Johnson v. U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
as 2:2013cv07464
Petitioner:
Emmett Johnson
Respondent:
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
