Cases 11 - 20 of 80
Jesse Hernandez et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05029
Plaintiff:
Jesse Hernandez, Luis Hernandez, Maria Hernandez and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00311
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Lackey v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 3:2022cv08039
Plaintiff:
John Steven Lackey
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Imber v. Lackey et al
as 1:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Brandon Imber
Defendant:
Bruce Lackey, Pam Lackey, Lackey Family Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Imber v. Lackey et al
as 1:2021at01158
Plaintiff:
Brandon Imber
Defendant:
Bruce Lackey, Pam Lackey, Lackey Family Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Lopez et al v. The State of Nevada ex rel. Nevada Department of Corrections
as 2:2021cv01161
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NEVADA ex rel. NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Rosemary McCrary, Brigido Bayawa and others
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Lopez and Colleen Lackey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lackey v. FCA US LLC et al
as 3:2020cv01719
Defendant:
Does 1 Through 10 and FCA US LLC
Plaintiff:
Jerron Lackey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lackey v. Napier et al
as 4:2020cv00274
Defendant:
Unknown Parties, Mark Napier, Jonathon Palmer and others
Plaintiff:
John Dale Lackey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moody #277807 v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2020cv00646
Defendant:
Unknown Lackey, Arizona Department of Corrections and Unknown Davis
Plaintiff:
Raymond Moody
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lackey v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2020cv00929
Plaintiff:
Charlie Lackey
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
