Cases 21 - 30 of 111
Karrick Garbett v. Arthur Anderson, et al
as 19-17057
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES ANDRES, Deputy Commissioner and ARTHUR ANDERSON, Presiding Commissioner
Defendant:
BOARD OF PRISON HEARINGS and JENNIFER SCHAFFER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KARRICK M. GARBETT
Brawley Public Safety Employee Association et al v. City of Brawley et al
as 3:2019cv01891
Plaintiff:
Darlene Garcia, Daniel Schleyer, Brawley Public Safety Employee Association and others
Defendant:
City of Brawley and Does 1 Through 10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 fl
Maria L. Schaffer v. Switch2Web.com et al
as 8:2019cv01743
Plaintiff:
Maria L. Schaffer
Defendant:
Sirchend Softwares Private Limited, Switch2Web.com and Does 1 through 10, inclusive, and each of them
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Snyder v. Starr et al
as 2:2019cv05071
Defendant:
Kelly Schaffer, Gary Greenlee, Madison Snyder and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Snyder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sylvia Schick et al v. Health Insurance Innovations, Inc.
as 3:2019cv01511
Plaintiff:
James Schaffer, James Nethnay, Lynne Crowton and others
Respondent:
Health Insurance Innovations, Inc. and does 1 through 10, inclusive, and each of them
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
James Schafffer et al v. Instaboost
as 2:2019cv06781
Plaintiff:
Sid Naiman, Abante Rooter and Plumbing, Inc. and JAMES SCHAFFER
Defendant:
Instaboost
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Williams #252218 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2019cv04456
Plaintiff:
Woodie Leo Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Jordan, H Pitz, J Silves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02751
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Schaffer v. Von Blanckensee et al
as 4:2019cv00226
Defendant:
J Rardin, Unknown Waite, B Von Blanckensee and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Schaffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
