Cases 21 - 30 of 1,245
Ho v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2024cv00239
Defendant:
P. Hernandez, W. Reubart, L. Lucas and others
Plaintiff:
Edmund Ho
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodward v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05442
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Petitioner:
Robert Lucas Woodward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Adamson, et al. v. Pierce County Municipality, et al.
as 24-3545
Plaintiff:
CHRIS ADAMSON, JASON BRAY, LUCAS COLE and others
Defendant:
PIERCE COUNTY MUNICIPALITY, a local government, JAMES SCHACHT, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, officially and individually, FRED WIST, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, officially and individually and others
Lucas v. LVGV, LLC
as 2:2024cv00947
Defendant:
LVGV, LLC doing business as M Resort Spa Casino
Plaintiff:
Catherine Aguinaldo Lucas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Schneider v. Kindred et al
as 3:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Lucas Schneider
Defendant:
Joshua Kindred and Mariana Carpeneti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(HC) Lucas v. Placer County Superior Court et al
as 2:2024cv01336
Petitioner:
David Lee Lucas
Respondent:
Placer County Superior Court and Brandon Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00749
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00748
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00750
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Vera Esquivel, et al. v. Miller, et al.
as 24-2737
Plaintiff:
MARLENE GUADALUPE VERA ESQUIVEL and SALVADOR MORALES LUCAS
Defendant:
LOREN K. MILLER, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
