Cases 21 - 30 of 14,485
Rose v. Matterport, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv03313
Plaintiff:
Andrew Rose
Defendant:
Matterport, Inc., RJ Pittman, Mike Gustafson and others
Anbang Group Holdings Co. Limited, et al. v. Zhou, et al.
as 24-3419
Not Yet Classified:
AB STABLE IX LLC, AB STABLE VIII LLC, ANBANG GROUP HOLDINGS CO. LIMITED and others
Defendant:
HAIBIN ZHOU, also known as Hai Bin Zhou also known as Andrew Zhou also known as Andy Bang also known as Joe Martin, WORLD AWARD FOUNDATION INC., YAN ZHAO, ATTORNEY and others
William Joiner v. Channel 5 LLC et al
as 8:2024cv01160
Plaintiff:
William G Joiner
Defendant:
Channel 5 LLC, Andrew Callaghan, Evan Gilbert-Katz and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2510 Wire Interception
Rojas v. City of Gilroy et al
as 5:2024cv03206
Plaintiff:
Joe Rojas
Defendant:
City Of Gilroy, Michael McMahon, Officer Stanford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Gray
as 24-3322
Defendant:
ANDREW STEVEN GRAY and Stryder D Austin
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00720
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Nevada Agency and Transfer Company v. Blue Water Petroleum Corp. et al
as 3:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Nevada Agency and Transfer Company
Defendant:
Blue Water Petroleum Corp. and Andrew Osichnuk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
(PC) Andrews v. Lee
as 1:2024cv00602
Plaintiff:
Donna Lee Andrews
Defendant:
Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Settles v. Hudson
as 4:2024cv00258
Petitioner:
Andrew Settles
Respondent:
B Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
