Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Lopez-Zamarripa v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv00128
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Alejandro Lopez-Zamarripa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Alejandro Lopez-Alvarado v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-73120
Petitioner:
ALEJANDRO LOPEZ-ALVARADO
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Alejandro Lopez et al v. Waldemar Rios et al
as 5:2014cv01738
Defendant:
Does and Waldemar Rios
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Lopez
Movant:
Sergio Rios
Faustino Lopez-Martinez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-72977
Petitioner:
FAUSTINO ALEJANDRO LOPEZ-MARTINEZ, AKA Alejandro Lopez-Cruz, AKA Blas Martinez
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Alejandro Lopez v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2013cv01140
Defendant:
K Chaffin, K Chaffin, County of Riverside and others
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Lopez
Lopez v. Taylor
as 2:2013cv00506
Petitioner:
Luis Alejandro Lopez
Respondent:
Ms. J. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Manuel Alejandro Lopez v. People of the State of Califorina
as 5:2012cv02224
Petitioner:
Manuel Alejandro Lopez
Respondent:
People of the State of Califorina
Aqui Es Texcoco, Inc. et al v. Lopez et al
as 3:2012cv02113
Plaintiff:
Aqui Es Texcoco, Inc. and Francisco Perez
Defendant:
Eduardo Maldonado Lopez , Alejandro Lopez Ferreira , Sandra Castillo and others
Counter_claimant:
Alejandro Lopez Ferreira , Sandra Castillo , Aqui Esta Texcoco and others
Counter_defendant:
Aqui Es Texcoco, Inc. and Francisco Perez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Lopez et al v. Aqui Es Texcoco, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv01215
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Maldonado Lopez and Alejandro Lopez Ferreira
Defendant:
Aqui Es Texcoco, Inc. , Francisco Perez and DOES 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441
Jaime Ortega-Lopez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-71075
Petitioner:
JAIME ALEJANDRO ORTEGA-LOPEZ, AKA Jaime Alejandro Lopez
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
