Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Montgomery v. Krull et al
as 2:2010cv02621
Plaintiff:
Donald Anderson Montgomery
Defendant:
Charles Krull, Elmer Parker, Andrew P Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jimenez v. Codama et al
as 2:2010cv02381
Plaintiff:
Marco Antonio Jimenez
Defendant:
Unknown Codama, Comcare, ValueOptions and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kenneth Dean Miller v. Motor Vehicle Division et al
as 2:2010cv06432
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D. Miller
Defendant:
Motor Vehicle Division, Stacey K Stanton, Stacey K Stanton and others
Lozano v. Thomas et al
as 2:2010cv01111
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lozano
Defendant:
Andrew P Thomas, William Clayton, Heather Wicht and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Durocher v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2010cv00817
Plaintiff:
John Harold Durocher
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Andrew P Thomas, Alane M Roby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vaughn v. Thomas et al
as 2:2010cv00601
Plaintiff:
Tilfert D Vaughn
Defendant:
Andrew P Thomas, Jan Brewer, Angela Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stanley Hall v. Joseph Arpaio, et al
as 09-17484
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STANLEY HALL
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH M. ARPAIO, ANDREW P. THOMAS, County Attorney, GARY DONAHOE, Judge Superior Court and others
Hall v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2009cv01879
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Andrew P Thomas, Gary Donahoe and others
Plaintiff:
Stanley Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pritchard v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2009cv01398
Plaintiff:
Bob Andy Pritchard
Defendant:
Joe Arpaio, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Andrew P Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mullins v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2009cv01377
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jerome Mullins
Defendant:
Joe Arpaio, Maricopa County Sheriffs Office, Andrew P Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
