Cases 21 - 29 of 29
AT&T Mobility, LLC v. Yeager, et al.
as 2:2013cv00007
Defendant:
Bowlin & Associates, Inc., Connie Bowlin, Lesser Law Group and others
Plaintiff:
AT&T Mobility, LLC
Counter Claimant:
Victoria Yeager, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Intervenor:
Parsons Behle & Latimer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jane Behling v. Michael Astrue
as 12-16921
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JANE MARIE BEHLING
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Timothy Blixseth v. Stephen Brown, et al
as 12-35193
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY L. BLIXSETH
Defendant - Appellee:
STEPHEN R. BROWN, an individual, GARLINGTON, LOHN, & ROBINSON, PLLP, a Montana limited liability partnership, JAMES A. PATTEN, an individual and others
Blixseth v. Brown et al
as 9:2011cv00085
Plaintiff:
Timothy L. Blixseth
Defendant:
Stephen Brown , Garlington, Lohn & Robinson, PLLP , James A. Patten and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Behling v. Astrue
as 2:2011cv00954
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Plaintiff:
Jane Marie Behling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Quanta Specialty Lines Insurance Company v. Behl Construction, LLC et al
as 3:2010cv00385
Defendant:
Mark R. Behl, Behl Construction, LLC, Gary Gintoff and others
Plaintiff:
Quanta Specialty Lines Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Behles Law Firm PC v. DeAtley et al
as 2:2010cv03035
Plaintiff:
Behles Law Firm PC
Defendant:
Alan DeAtley , Debra DeAtley , Solutions International Oregon LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Quanta Specialty Line Insurance vs Motherway
as 3:2008cv00434
Plaintiff:
Quanta Specialty Lines Insurance
Defendant:
Thomas Motherway, Dede Motherway, Motherway Family Trust and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Sumesh Behl et al v. Gerard Heinauer
as 2:2007cv01610
Plaintiff:
Sumesh Behl and Bharti Behl
Defendant:
Gerald Heinauer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
