Cases 21 - 30 of 53
Chism v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2016cv01106
Plaintiff:
Leah Sue Chism
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Chism Jr. v. State of California
as 3:2016cv01337
Plaintiff:
William Ray Chism Jr.
Defendant:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chism v. Credit One Bank, N.A.
as 3:2016cv00672
Plaintiff:
Derek Chism
Defendant:
Credit One Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Vincent-Chism v. Colvin
as 2:2016cv00531
Plaintiff:
Tina Vincent-Chism
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Mehmood v. Delaney et al
as 2:2015cv01818
Defendant:
11 Board of Governors, USPS, 12 Board Members, CCA, Administrative Office of the United States Courts and others
Plaintiff:
Yasir Mehmood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Qazi v. ERT, NSDC et al
as 2:2015cv01525
Respondent:
Mr. Barbier, Lt. Bench, Officer Bowman and others
Petitioner:
Omar Qazi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mehmood v. United States of America et al
as 2:2015cv01369
Defendant:
Board of State Prison Commissioners, State of Nevada, C.C.A., C.E.O. of Trinity Services Group and others
Plaintiff:
Yasir Mehmood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banda-Alicea v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 2:2014cv01437
Plaintiff:
Mario Banda-Alicea
Defendant:
Jim Chism, Charlotte Collins, S. Connors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chism v. Davis
as 2:2013cv02078
Petitioner:
William H. Chism, III
Respondent:
Ron Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
William Chism, III v. California Supreme Court
as 13-71923
:
In re: WILLIAM H. CHISM, III
Petitioner:
WILLIAM H. CHISM, III
Respondent:
CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT
Real Party In Interest:
RON DAVIS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
