Cases 21 - 30 of 785
CASE OPENED IN ERROR v. CASE OPENED IN ERROR
as 1:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
CASE OPENED IN ERROR
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
Sand v. Camp Lejeune Case et al
as 4:2023cv05167
Plaintiff:
Gretchen Anna Sand
Defendant:
Camp Lejeune Case and Optima Tax Relief
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chanel, Inc. v. Fe Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv02946
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Defendant:
Fe Corporation, Farshad Najafi and MM Cell Corporation Doing business as Custom Cases Phone Repair
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Brown v. Case #C-23-370497-1 et al
as 2:2023cv02087
Plaintiff:
Jessica M Brown
Defendant:
Case #C-23-370497-1, Probation #V24-0124, Officer Polslenauska and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Borden v. Case #1 et al
as 3:2023cv00641
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Borden
Defendant:
Case #1, Case #2, Case #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Houston v. Encore Event Technologies, et al.
as 24-240
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON, Clerk to RETURN w/out docketing any further submissions in this closed case, #37
Defendant / Appellee:
ENCORE EVENT TECHNOLOGIES and DIANNE FERRANTE
(PC) Ardds v. Clark et al
as 1:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Antoine L. Ardds
Defendant:
Ken Clark, D. Hicks, D. Case and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Case v. Broomfield et al
as 5:2023cv05757
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Case
Defendant:
Ron Broomfield and Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv09256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
