Cases 21 - 30 of 67
Rachel Lessem, et al v. Pfizer, Inc., et al
as 17-56294
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RACHEL LESSEM, an individual, KIM HOLLIMAN, an individual, DEBORA BROICH, as wife and as an individual and others
Defendant - Appellant:
PFIZER, INC.
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and DOES, 1-50
Mohammadi et al v. Audi AG et al
as 3:2017cv02440
Plaintiff:
Neda Mohammadi , Athena Nelson , Anand Agrawal and others
Defendant:
Audi of America LLC and Audi AG
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Lewis v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv01224
Plaintiff:
James Lewis
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rachel Lessem et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02841
Plaintiff:
Jane E. Abbey, Hiawatha Barksdale, Margaret Beech and others
Defendant:
DOES, McKesson Corporation and Pfizer, Inc.
Schoenborn v. Deschutes County Health Services Department et al
as 6:2017cv00493
Defendant:
Deschutes County Health Services Department, Rebecca Elger, Lori Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Schoenborn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James Lewis v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 2:2017cv01179
Plaintiff:
James Lewis
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
USA v. James Savage
as 17-55065
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES LEWIS SAVAGE
Lewis v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv04147
Plaintiff:
James Lewis
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Barber, et al v. Cordis Corporation
as 16-80140
Plaintiff - Respondent:
MICHAEL BARBER, ANDREW CLOS, JACQUELYN HANSON and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
CORDIS CORPORATION
Barber et al v. Cordis Corporation et al
as 3:2016cv03086
Plaintiff:
Michael Barber , Andrew Clos , Jacquelyn Hanson and others
Defendant:
Cordis Corporation , Johnson & Johnson and Cardinal Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
