Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Barbara L. Peters v. Wachovia Bank NA et al
as 5:2011cv00255
Defendant:
Does, Regional Service Corp and Wachovia Bank NA
Plaintiff:
Barbara L Peters
Peters v. Aurora Loan Services LLC et al
as 2:2010cv02119
Plaintiff:
Kathryn L Peters
Defendant:
Aurora Loan Services LLC , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Incorporated and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Reese v. CDCR Medical Department et al
as 1:2010cv01352
Plaintiff:
Bruce Reese
Defendant:
CDCR Medical Department, A. Enenmoh and L. Peters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caseres v. Terhune et al
as 1:2010cv01239
Plaintiff:
Paul Angelo Caseres
Defendant:
C. A. Terhune, Wendy Still, Enenmoh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Donley v. Peters
as 2:2010cv05070
Plaintiff:
Josh Donley
Defendant:
L Peters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Callan et al v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00566
Plaintiff:
Trevor Callan, Timothy Callan and Ryan Callan
Defendant:
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc., Carol T. Christ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Peters et al v. Forbo Adhesives, LLC
as 6:2007cv06339
Plaintiff:
Bernard J Peters and Sybil L. Peters
Defendant:
Forbo Adhesives, LLC and Forbo Adhesives, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Forbo Adhesives, LLC v. Industrial Adhesives, Inc. et al
as 6:2007cv06310
Plaintiff:
Forbo Adhesives, LLC, Forbo Adhesives, LLC, Forbo Adhesives, LLC and others
Defendant:
Industrial Adhesives, Inc., Bernard J Peters and Sybil L. Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
USA v. Sawyer, et al
as 05-17347
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
14.02 ACRES OF LAND MORE OR LESS IN FRESNO COUNTY, EDNA E. STONE, PAUL KRAJIAN and others
Defendant - Appellant:
MAXINE H. SAWYER, MARK W. SAWYER, HARRIET H. LEONARD and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
