Cases 21 - 30 of 161
Bernardo Mares v. Ken Clark
as 22-55649
Petitioner / Appellant:
BERNARDO ALEJANDRO MARES
Respondent / Appellee:
KEN CLARK, Warden
Gustavo Mares v. County of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2022cv01099
Plaintiff:
GUSTAVO MARES
Defendant:
County of San Bernardino, Devon Steuerwald, Joseph Mora and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gilbert Saucillo, et al v. Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC, et al
as 22-55560
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GILBERT SAUCILLO and JAMES R. RUDSELL, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff:
JOHN BURNELL and JACK POLLOCK
Appellant:
SADASHIV MARES
Defendant / Appellee:
SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY OF ARIZONA, LLC, an Arizona corporation
Defendant:
SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY INCORPORATED and DOES
USA v. Francisco Mares
as 22-10090
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
FRANCISCO JAIVER MARES, AKA Pancho
Lusby v. Lincare
as 2:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
Maree Lusby
Defendant:
Lincare
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Forrest et al v. Spizzirri et al
as 2:2021cv01688
Plaintiff:
William F Forrest, Wendy Smith, Michelle Martinez and others
Defendant:
Keith Spizzirri, Miriam Spizzirri, Ken Maring and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bernardo Alejandro Mares v. Ken Clark
as 8:2021cv00843
Petitioner:
Bernardo Alejandro Mares
Respondent:
Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00757
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
