Cases 21 - 30 of 196
Roger Parker v. County of Riverside, et al
as 22-80041
Respondent:
ROGER WAYNE PARKER
Petitioner:
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, PAUL E. ZELLERBACK, SEAN LAFFERTY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Frink, et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2022cv01232
Plaintiff:
Carl Anthony Frink, Danny L. Jordan, Debra J. Holcomb and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01864
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Williams v. Arizona Superior Court of Pima County et al
as 4:2021cv00410
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Rose Williams
Defendant:
Arizona Superior Court of Pima County, Arizona Commission on Judicial Conduct, Paul E Tang and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Channel v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2021cv01826
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Channel, Sr.
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, James A Soto, Jacqueline M Rateau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Channel v. Arizona, State of et al
as 4:2021cv00445
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Channel, Sr.
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, James A Soto, Jacqueline Rateau and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vaughn v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2021cv01181
Plaintiff:
Paul E. Vaughn
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Stephen Puleo et al v. Patrick Nelson et al
as 2:2021cv06443
Plaintiff:
Stephen Puleo, Michelle Puleo, Lee E. Hughes and others
Defendant:
Patrick Nelson, Nelson Partners, LLC, AXONIC CAPITAL, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv05039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
